CADfix Video for CAE
In the realm of numerical simulation, 3D model quality plays a decisive role in obtaining reliable results. Holes and small geometric details often represent up to 80% of meshing time while generally being superfluous for analysis. Engineers waste precious hours manually simplifying these elements, particularly on non-parametric CAD models lacking construction history.
Automatic hole suppression is now a genuine optimization lever for engineering departments, drastically reducing preparation times and improving the quality of numerical simulations.
In the intricate world of 3D simulation and CAD design, bidirectional interoperability between the two proves to be a major issue. Adjusting CAD models based on simulation outcomes can be a colossal task, especially when aiming to mirror simulated reality. In this light, CADfix stands out by offering an automated morphing solution.
The challenges of interoperability between CAD models and simulation are at the heart of many technical hurdles. The solution CADfix stands out in this domain, ensuring a smooth transition between design and simulation.
As the world of 3D printing and fabrication additive continues to evolve, so does the need for high-quality CAD models. Enter CADfix. In the bustling realm of CAD, ensuring that models are optimized for 3D printing has become a paramount concern. The stakes are high, and the tools available play a vital role. With solutions like CADfix, the challenges faced during the CAD model preparation for 3D printing processes are addressed effectively. But what exactly is involved in this intricate process?
The challenges of numerical simulation are rapidly evolving in modern industry, and geometry fusion has become a crucial step in ensuring reliable results. In a world where 78% of industrial companies use numerical simulation to reduce their development costs, CAD model preparation is becoming a determining factor for success. Geometric fusion allows complex assemblies to be transformed into simplified models, adapted to the specific requirements of different types of simulation.
Engineers and analysts face daily model quality issues: incomplete geometries, duplicate entities, interferences, or excessive complexity. These defects, often invisible in the original CAD environment, become major obstacles when moving to simulation, resulting in additional delays, unexpected costs, and sometimes erroneous results.
The preparation of CAD models for numerical analysis often represents up to 80% of the total time devoted to simulation projects. The automatic removal of fillets and chamfers constitutes a critical step in this process, particularly for non-parametric models where the absence of construction history significantly complicates simplification operations. These geometric elements, although essential for manufacturing, generate unnecessarily complex meshes that dramatically slow down calculations without improving the accuracy of results. Analysis engineers find themselves confronted with a permanent dilemma: maintain geometric fidelity or optimize calculation performance?